Monday, January 23, 2012

Men and women – not men v/s women

Men and women are mostly written or talked about when it is about men v/s women. Opposite genders, they are placed on opposite sides, confronting with each other through ages and mindlessly trying to be equals. Let me see if this paradigm of being and staying on ‘either’ sides or being equal to each other can be changed. For doing this, I will talk about both men and women in an unstructured way. My experience with women has not been negligible at all. As a child I was surrounded by my mother, aunts, mother’s and aunts’ friends, as a teenager by my friends, then by my wife, her friends and later by my daughter and her friends. What I am trying to say here is that my experience is nothing special, almost anybody would have had similar experiences. However, I promise to take a serious insight into these two variables.

As a child, I did not understand why women struggled to be equal as men, what the need was. Do they think they are inferior to men and hence strive to be equal? When I grew up I understood that women were fighting for justice: justice for equality. I find this amusing because in all oppressions against women that we know of, the oppressors are not men alone. If we really probe, we will see that injustices against women were done equally by men and women. I can go on in detail with depressing statistics to show that right from the birth of a girl child, to a daughter being married and ragged and dragged, to gang rapes, to burning of witches to not giving rights to widow re-marriages, to disinheriting women, only men were not involved. It was both men and women torturing or ragging a woman or a set of women. If I zoom in a little, we will find that in most cases it is women who torture women, sometimes with the cold war going on silently. with men not even aware of what is going on. It happens amongst families, friends. Woman to woman jealousy is a phenomenon not unheard of. Sometimes it can be felt in offices amongst women colleagues, sometimes at home, between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, between sisters, amongst friends, and sometimes even between the mother and the daughter what have you!
The objective of writing this is to show that the feminine fight for justice and equality would have had a much more sense and force had it not been a gender battle. It is a battle against oppression, against the social malice where both men and women are included. If women fight against men, the oppression against women will never go because in the women’s side will be those women who torture their own gender with an alacrity and enthusiasm that men can only aspire to match. Women, although less corrupt and more intelligent, are perpetually fighting; tacitly with women and openly with men.

If we re-look at the two variables, we will see that both the offenders and defenders have a mixed gender. If that is so, how can we say that women are tortured by men? Even in a situation where a woman is violated, we are surprised to find that in most of the cases, the scoundrels involved in the crime are both men and women, not men alone. A woman can be conceited, calculative and harmful for the society inasmuch the same way as men can be dishonest, violent and mindless.

The approach that one gender tortures another and the appeal that women should be treated as equals are both wrong. Should be treated? As equals? What kind of an insulting statement is that! How do women associate themselves with such a humiliating cause to fight for! Can men and women ever be equal? If three and three make six, they are just numbers, but what can three men and three women make? They make six human beings each different from the other. Equal is more mathematical then anything else. Wonder why Einstein said that everything that counts can not necessarily be counted, and everything that can be counted does not necessarily count. So equality is a tragedy we are seeking for, aren’t we?

Attraction between men and women is natural and will continue to be so. One of the outcomes of attraction is submission, the willingness to do something unconditionally. To most women, being a housewife is an insult! There is a group of people who thinks that since men go to work, women should also have to follow. Women to them are tortured because they do not have economic independence. Do we mean to say that women who have economic independence are not tortured? A major part of confused women, just to prove a point, go and earn money from the outside world, although deep inside, they’d like to be at home. What is more interesting is the way these two groups of women, the working women and housewives talk about each other. A housewife snaps and says, ‘I don’t need to work’ while a working woman says, ‘I can’t put up with housewives, they are so limited. For me they are just vegetables and good for nothings’. Where do men figure here! Trust me they like women anyway, vegetable or otherwise. This is very vital in bringing about a change in the mental model because women who have economic independence are also tortured, both at home and in offices. I think women should not be tortured even if they don’t have economic independence. Every single day, women are passing judgements on women and curbing down on their liberation by not understanding what the real issue is.

Let me zoom in a little more. A man tortures his wife on bed by applying force. This is a battle that needs to be fought, but when she goes to her mother, she does not get her support, and about her mother-in-law, less said the better. She goes to NGOs who rightfully fight against the man, but doesn’t realize that there are other women supporting the man. A group of confused men and women have been telling women to go out and work without sorting their issues at home. As a result, a majority of women are now being tortured at home as well as at their workplaces by both men and women. If they are at home, they are tortured; if they leave home they are tortured doubly. The reason for this torture is not having economic independence; the reason is women’s inability to unconditionally support women and be strong when it is most needed.

When a housewife wants to cook something for her husband it doesn’t mean that the wife is his servant, or that she is being treated as a doormat! Some of those housewives’ same-gender friends, especially those who are working would tell her just that – that she is being treated as a doormat. When a husband buys something for his spouse, the only person he’d be scared to inform would be his mother! Now imagine the opposite, the husband would be proud to say that he cooks for his family, to declare ‘I can cook’. In the same way, the wife can proudly say that she gifted her husband a XYLO. So the action is not the issue, the actors are. These are simple silly examples, but it is these situations that create our mental models and cloud are thoughts until they become disproportionate, uncontrollable and incomprehensible.

Well wait a minute… am I talking sense? I leave that to you men and women…come up with a very honest answer so that it can help change our models and the way we look at the world. And this is a global challenge. Men and women around the world don’t know what they are fighting for and who they are fighting against. Torture against women is caused by society comprising men and women and should be fought by society as a whole.

Monday, January 16, 2012

Name it

name it

Painting a picture on a pillow frame
My eyes closed face drowned inside hands firmly on the sides
My mind free
I am upside down pretending to sleep my chest breathing fast my stomach stuck unmoved
My mind free
My legs lay over the broader set my ankles tensed make a hollow space
My mind free
All the parts fixed all set and fine
Dark lights of yellow lines
Play hide and seek in breathless sights
Lips hang in trees spread miles and miles
Barks scratch the skins roots take the links
Throw up foods that hang as fruits
All fit and fine I let it loose
Water drools from all over me
I see a child down the painted tree
I printed thus in a pillow frame
I wonder if I’d give it a name
It sees the fruits and smiles at me
My mind free
I release my germs of destiny.

How will our countries grow?

How will our countries grow?

The age-old conflict

The age-old conflict is still on. Sometimes the rage of conflict is felt through violence sometimes through meetings and child-like feuds and sometimes it is felt in the minds. The present generation is confused because although they know they have to mindlessly follow the rage, the hatred, but do not know why. They have not seen the separation, the snatching away of roots from people who were shifted from one end to the other. All they know is that they have to follow and continue with the rage, with the hatred. But the question is who snatched what from whom? And more intriguing question is why? As an individual whose historicity is positioned in the middle of the old and the new generations, and as part of one of the countries, I think I have the means to respond to the question. Why did we snatch, why did we separate and more so why are we still continuing with the same bitterness – the answer to all of these is belief – because our ways of looking at the world did not match. However it is not the beliefs alone that caused the snatchings, it is rather the inability to tolerate them that did. One says east, the other says west, one says full moon, the other says the crescent, one says pig the other says cow. We do not grow up enough to realize that these beliefs centre on the same thing – either it is the direction, or the moon, or the animals or scriptures. We do not understand that both need to worship in one direction, spare one animal from slaughter, respect the moon, and need to have a scripture to follow! We are safeguarding our scriptures, our beliefs, and not safeguarding ourselves. I shall stop right here so that I do not end up, even unconsciously offending anyone.
The purpose of my writing is not to show the differences, not to insult any belief, but to see whether we, with different beliefs, can consider re-uniting as well-meaning neighbours keeping our differences intact, for a larger cause. What is the larger cause, it is growth and development. It is peace. For a long time I thought on how to expand the word ‘grow’ – would it be more appropriate to expand it as ‘get rid of wars’ or ‘get rid of walls’? Does the answer lie in the acronym itself! Well for us to actually get rid of wars is not as simple as finding an acronym. Whether it is wars or walls we need to fight against I do not know, but I certainly know that it is time we do something worthwhile to make the countries worth living. And until the time we have this war or the wall standing between the belief, thoughts and intentions will die a thousand deaths.
Is this a fantasy?
Let me take off from reality to see what would happen should we give peace our priority. In short, we will grow. There will be an all around growth that could benefit the world more than stunning it. All the three countries sharing borders and living in despair and agony could over time turn into an area where there would be growth and development. Our countries can flourish in natural resources, abound in spices, and with the storehouse of techies we have, let alone IBMs, we could build a NASA here. No other country can match us in terms of population – population where the majorities are youngsters. A group of people who are perplexed and want to forget what happened in the past, because they were not a part of that historicity. They don’t know what happened between us in and till 1947. We have fought since our independences, which is more than sixty years. If we devote our next thirty years learning not to fight and focus on prosperity of the countries through being interdependent and through mutual help, our histories can change. But the question is whether we are prepared.
Learning from others
Let us look at the United States and Canada. Can anyone imagine any kind of tension there? Why not? Let them also have some cross-border tensions and let us give them our words of advice of maintaining peace. How would it be if we solved our problems without them intervening? And how would it be if we solved their problems! They are very firm on their relationships and know that in order to have power over the so-called ‘developing’ countries; they need to have peace in their respective lands. They have seen and learnt from the disastrous wars, which they call as ‘world wars’, the dangers and threats it can pose to growth and development. The United States emerged as the most powerful country post second world war with the economic decline of the most of Europe. Did Europe stop after that? They certainly found ways to unite as a community.
Are we weak?
Why is it that for ages we are allowing our lands to be the dumping ground of their garbage, either their products or literally their garbage! Why is it that the West till date has succeeded in selling arms and ammunitions to the so-called ‘third world’ countries? Why is it that we have to seek their permission as to what to grow on our own lands? The answer to all these questions is just one – our differences. They are harping on our differences, and Jesus we have many. But to sum it all, our Master difference is one – our belief. We are not able to sort our differences because of the people? I don’t think so. We are not able to sort our differences because of political intentions, or because of fundamentalists? I don’t think so. Blaming the people, or the fundamentalists, or the political leaders will not help. If we really need to understand why we aren’t able to solve our differences or what is it that is preventing us from accepting people of different faiths to unite, co-exist or work and live together, we need to invest some meaningful time together involving everyone and find out the answer. As of now, our differences are our weaknesses which other countries are taking full advantage of.
The blame game
The UK
How long can we blame the Brits for dividing us? Did the UK divide us or did we divide because we wanted to? I think we divided because we wanted the division – we were too intolerant to stay together. Otherwise how are we still continuing with this division, with this dissension! Now that we are divided, let us accept that and move on. Since 1947 we have accepted that we are intolerant towards our respective religions. So be it, let the religions never unite. However, for a greater cause can’t we unite as neighbours? Blaming the UK means only one thing - we can never unite because we are weak – we are victims and they are victors.
The US
The US is undoubtedly the super power now, and they deserve to be just that. They are victors, not victims. They have also fought for years for their independence and it was not a cake walk for them to be where they are today. If they protect and safeguard the interests of their country and neighbours, they are doing it for the sake of growth and they have every right to do that. In the same way we also have the right to rise above our differences. A major wealth flows from our countries for buying arms and ammunitions. If we buy, they why blame the sellers? The sellers will sell and continue to do so but why do we buy? We buy because of our insecurity and instability. So whether we need to stop buying or not will depend on the policies we adopt as neighbouring countries. We allow tensions to float around us for them to sell us arms. Blaming the US would only make us more directionless and clueless as to how we can grow. The buying of arms is just one amongst a plethora of examples.
Our policies and politicians
I have heard of this a number of times that politicians do not want us to unite. We have tensions amongst countries because our politicians are gaining out of this created tension. I don’t know how much of truth is there in this thought. However, the truth is that no politician, in any of these countries, is greater than their people.
The fundamentalists
Why do we blame the fundamentalists? Who creates fundamentalists? What do the fundamentalists want actually? They want to continue with their own respective belief systems. Don’t we have room for letting the fundamentalists be fundamentalists and move on? Fundamentalists do not always indulge in violence, do they? Well if they do, there are ways to handle the situations. But please, let us not try to reform them. If there are fundamentalists who want to pray in their own ways, let them do what they want. Praying is not counter-productive after all. And besides, they are not against growth and development. Why do we want to make them tolerant? Our countries feel that we cannot do anything until there are no fundamentalists. I find this laughable to see that sometimes we are weak because of Europe, America, and sometimes for our own people! Be it politicians or fundamentalists, our weakness remains a given. The bottom-line is we invariably end up saying is that nothing is possible.
Who do we blame next – History or Religion?
If we have no one to blame, then we blame it on History. Blaming is comfortable because it is lazy. It is ok to be victims because then we don’t have to change. Although it makes us live in despair, still it is far more comfortable. Well the fact is that the two religions can never be together and our histories cannot change. However, we can change… if we accept that despite the differences, we need to work for peace and prosperity. Our population is a threat to the world because it is active and vibrant. The stronger countries will definitely try to dissuade us and there is nothing wrong in that. They will try to safeguard their interests. The question is whether we can safeguard ours? Does this mean we are raging war against the stronger countries? No. it means we are trying to make our own countries equally vibrant economically and ergonomically. And as far as blaming History or Religion goes, I can tell you even with my limited understanding that while History may or may not be laughing at us, Religion definitely is praying for us.
Knot, to be
All I know like most everybody is that, if one day, any day we are able to solve our own differences, break the invisible walls separating us – the ones that are stronger than the visible ones that once separated the two Germany for long, there will be growth and development and re-emergence of peace and prosperity in these three countries. The present generation would be able to live with love leaving the past inherited differences behind.
Summary
We need to
- Accept our differences
- Ensure peace, profitability and prosperity for every individual living in these three countries
- Learn from the successful European countries and the US and emulate their principles of growth
- Get rid of wars and the walls of dissension
- Stop blaming
- Have a common mission; vision and a target date for making the three countries prosper
- Understand that religions cannot unite, but neighbours can

Friday, January 13, 2012

Sun on my candle

sun on my candle

I have the Sun on my candle
The flames never rise the light never dies
Shows played in the Frame
Have nothing to blame

I have the Sky on my hut
The roof never flies the shade never lies
Works done on the Field
Have plenty to yield

I have the Mountain on my head
The fruit never fails the tree never trails
Sounds weave through the roof and live in the Frame
The flames never rise the light never dies

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Closed room

closed room

I am now inside a room
Full of words
In the Absolute, all absorbed
Ten on ten
I hear happy we are happy
We have one goal the only goal
To do the same work and rock and roll
But the words don’t break and smell
Still we live in heaven they in hell.
The music is measured
It is so well designed so well aligned
Ten on ten
Crafty are the walls, windows seat like obedient dolls
Every corner receives the thought of cost
All observed, not a place nowhere lost
Ten on ten on common sense,
Results shine like the falling star
We laugh and cry from near and far
Ps and Qs stand so straight and talk so right
Eyes see numbers, heavy and light
Inside the room, on a starry night

Breaking apart


breaking apart

My mirror has broken.
It did not make any sound, as it fell on the
grass.
My head hung, I could see the broken sky with muddy borders in the
grassy background.
There are mirrors now; they are mirrors, on the ground.
Broken memories smashed onto the field where I stood, without bending.
The first drop of rain fell on the
glass.
The numb drops came softer and light.
The parts of my moist mirror were caught into the soggy field that made no sound.
There are mirrors now; they are mirrors, on the ground.
Came the wind as I stood still in the pin drop game.
The sun trespassed and washed me dry, now
nothing bent and nothing hung – the parts no more mine, that lay on the
grass.

Stories


It’s dark now.
A little while ago, there was light in the sky.
My vision could go till a distance and travel back into the eyes with stories to tell.
I saw men, women, boys and girls talking with their teeth and tongues.
From a distance I could hear a window playing an instrument.
There must have been a person behind, which the eyes could not find.
The tune was trying to tell me something… the ears
Tried to hear all the grammar that poured into them
From the window, little far from near.
I walked a step or three but went miles away from me…
… lights began to fly, the least of blue to the sky.
Now darkness in the trees and blackness in the nests,
My sight was off the dogs and frogs,
They barked and croaked so clear with crickets beating everywhere.
Unknown sounds came to me but were left as they’d be.
I could take one step at a time, could even fall, there wasn’t a moon, no stars – no scratch of light at all;
The feet hurt, hands full of mud,
I walked on the flat, on the mound,
took one step, at a time, from the surface to the ground.
There was sometimes rhythm in my step, sometimes none at all.
I heard the brooks, the careful fluttering of the wings, the snores of strangers,
Smelt the four-legged passengers; on-lookers may be…
Their eyes shining bright at me,
Breeze sometimes smelt fresh, it carried the flowers, the mud, the blood and the flesh.
A drop of little sweat came running from the head, ran straight into the groin,
I shivered out of cold, and felt the living dread.
By then I was set to dark; my mind, now fit to fall and find.
The sounds of the dew, dropped countless from a few;
Poured music in the ears, that didn’t hear for years.
It’s light now.
A little while ago, there was darkness in the sky.
My vision could go till a distance and travel back into the eyes with stories to tell.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Passing the bill or the ball

Much have been talked or written about Anna and his team. There is no doubt that every Indian wants corruption to end. Does team Anna know how to end corruption? I guess the answer is yes and no. Yes if we all support the team and no if we withdraw oursleves from it. Yes the team has made mistakes. Recently they were thrown on the headlines of all news channels for some decisions they have taken. I think it was a mistake primarily because the decisions were not discussed with all Indians! I might sound ignorant, but the purpose of forming Lokayukt is to have a representative for the common people, the 'aam janta' so to speak, where decisions taken by the team representing Indians would be on getting the concurrence of the nation.

Interestingly, taking this cue, the 'opposition parties', which is Team Anna v/s all political parties, are condemning the very formation of the team. Mr. Digvijay Singh has said openly that Anna's team members are not his well-wishers. Attempts are also made to highlight that Mumbai was much less of a success than Delhi because of the 'number game'. My question is, if it is not Anna and his team, then who is it? It was Anna who for the first time raised his voice against corruption and 'genuinely' wanted to do something for the nation. However, they have made mistakes. But just because they have made mistakes does not mean that the team is not a valid one.
What I am trying to say here is that team Anna should be encouraged by us Indians. Team Anna is a solid and robust team with some extremely good and well-meaning people. However, my appeal to Arvind and Kiran Bedi is that they should listen to the critics and constantly try to develop the team instead of being defensive.

There are people like Shekhar Gupta, Barkha Dutt, Pronoy Roy, Narayan Murthy who are constantly helping the team by sharing opposite points of view. A very sensible discussion that came on NDTV with Shekar Gupta, Pronoy Roy, Narayanmurthy [the self-acclaimed small man - well sir, nobody thinks you are a small man, you are one leader that Indians need] and Arvind trying to look at the very purpose of team Anna. It might sound a little disconnected, but the discussion reminded me of the film 'The Sound of music'. In the film, the nuns were discussing whether Maria, another fellow nun was fit to be in the order. All the nuns were giving their different opinions on the topic. While everyone thought they were fighting, the Reverend Mother looked at it from a different perspective - she said, all the nuns were trying to help each other by sharing opposite points of view. Now this was exactly what Shekar, Pronoy and Murthy were trying to do. This is what team Anna should remember. See when Shekhar is saying that flogging cannot be considered as a license to rehabilitate anyone in a democratic country, it does not mean he's trying to say that team Anna has to dismissed, he's trying to enormously help you by finding perhaps an alternative way to end corruption. Or when Pronoy or Murthy are urging you to only focus on 'ending corruption', it has some purpose to it. Please do no let yourself convert into a machinery you are fighting against.

In the programme 'The buck stops hear' concerning the failure to pass the bill, I was amused to notice that all the speakers were busy discussing where who did wrong. When the blame game starts it means only one thing; that corruption is here to stay. Ask Nandan Nilekani or Naraynmurthy - they are exponents of Peter Senge's Systems thinking! You start the blame game means you accept the situation. Nobody including Barkha, who was wearing the 'blue hat' wanted to discuss on how to end corruption. I do not mean to criticise Barkha. However, she according to me, should rise above her role as a journalist and help team Anna find a way.
Every Indian, by default, belongs to the team. Let's all sit together, do a problem map and discuss 'only', like a paranoid, on how to end corruption, we will find out a way. However, a humongous task, even if temporarily, has to be addressed first:
We have to resolve our conflicts first. I don't want to sound like a spiritual guru, but I can definitely lay bare what I feel. Conflict amongst parties, Advani, Manmohan Singh, Rahul, Mayawati, Mamta, Budhhadeb, Lalu prasad Yadav have to work together. Conflicts amongst channels, we want Pronoy, Rajdeep and Barkha to work together. Conflicts amongst organisations, both public and private sectors. Conflicts between families, if any...for example, Rahul, Varun, Maneka and Sonia have to work together. My message to the Gandhi family is that if you are to at all resolve Indian conflicts, resolve your family's first. And my message to all political leaders is, please stop fighting, get out of the child ego please. We are thinking of our smaller roles and forgetting the bigger role that all of us have in common. At the end of it all, we are all Indians, and it is our nation's shame, as Kabir Bedi rightly pointed out stating that our inability to pass the bill is maligning India's brand image. You see these people are all great people and they are all India's well-wishers. More than passing the bill, the bigger picture is about ending corruption. If we don't discuss it now by making ending corruption our fetish, the bill, whether passed or failed will just be another bill.
I am sure if we discuss for some days on how to end corruption by drawing a problem map, we will have a much better understanding of the virus that has spread its wings in all sectors and 'functions' of society over time without showing any signs of leaving. Once things are back to normal, we can go back to our respective parties, assume our respective roles and start fighting again, but here we will fight in a state devoid of corruption. And the day we are able to end corruption, we will free all prisoners from every Indian prisons, for we know that all of us, in some way or the other, were guilty of being in the viral system.
My simple and perhaps an ignorant message for all the people who matter is
Do not blame or fight.
Unite
To see the light.

Disclaimer: I have not used salutations for anybody. I am sure you could hear them. If not, my apologies.